Top 10 Historically Inaccurate Movies


Top 10 Historically Inaccurate Movies

Posted by SexiVixxEN 120 days ago
We all accept that movies stretch the truth in the interest of building drama. The following ten flicks, however, treat the truth like it was Silly Putty -- pulling and twisting it until it's unrecognizable.
10,000 B.C.
Director Roland Emmerich is usually a stickler for realism (see: sending a computer virus via Macintosh to aliens in Independence Day). So we hate to inform him that woolly mammoths were not, in fact, used to build pyramids. Heck, woolly mammoths weren't even found in the desert. They wouldn't need to be woolly if that were the case. And there weren't any pyramids in Egypt until 2,500 B.C or so.

Gladiator
Emperor Commodus was not the sniveling sister-obsessed creep portrayed in the movie. A violent alcoholic, sure, but not so whiny. He ruled ably for over a decade rather than ineptly for a couple months. He also didn't kill his father, Marcus Aurelius, who actually died of chickenpox. And instead of being killed in the gladiatorial arena, he was murdered in his bathtub.

300
Though this paean to ancient moral codes and modern physical training is based on the real Battle of Thermopylae, the film takes many stylistic liberties. The most obvious one being Persian king Xerxes was not an 8-foot-tall Cirque du Soleil reject. The Spartan council was made up of men over the age of 60, with no one as young as Theron (played by 37-year-old Dominic West). And the warriors of Sparta went into battle wearing bronze armor, not just leather Speedos.
The Last Samurai
The Japanese in the late 19th century did hire foreign advisers to modernize their army, but they were mostly French, not American. Ken Watanabe's character was based on the real Saigo Takamori who committed ritual suicide, or "seppuku," in defeat rather than in a volley of Gatling gun fire. Also, it's doubtful that a 40-something alcoholic Civil War vet, even one with great hair, would master the chopsticks much less the samurai sword.
Apocalypto
This one movie has given entire Anthropology departments migraines. Sure the Maya did have the odd human sacrifice but not to Kulkulkan, the Sun God, and only high-ranking captives taken in battle were killed. The conquistadors arriving at the end of the film made for unlikely saviors: an estimated 90% of indigenous American population was killed by smallpox from their infected livestock.
Memoirs of a Geisha
The geisha coming-of-age, called "mizuage," was really more of a makeover, where she changed her hairstyle and clothes. It didn't involve her getting... intimate with a client. In the climactic scene where Sayuri wows Gion patrons with her dancing prowess, her routine - which involves some platform shoes, fake snow, and a strobe light - seems more like a Studio 54 drag show than anything in pre-war Kyoto.
Braveheart
Let's forget the fact that kilts weren't worn in Scotland until about 300 years after William Wallace's day and just do some simple math. According to the movie, Wallace's blue-eyed charm at the Battle of Falkirk was so overpowering, he seduced King Edward II's wife, Isabella of France, and the result of their affair was Edward III. But according to the history books, Isabella was three years old at the time of Falkirk, and Edward III was born seven years after Wallace died.
Elizabeth: The Golden Age
In 1585, when the movie takes place, Queen Elizabeth was 52 years old - Cate Blanchett was 36 when she shot the film - and was not being courted by suitors like Ivan the Terrible (who was dead by then). And though the movie has her rallying the troops at Tilbury astride a white steed in full armor with a sword, in fact she rode side saddle, carrying a baton. She was more of a regal majorette than Joan of Arc.
The Patriot
Revolutionary War figure Francis "The Swamp Fox" Marion was the basis for Mel Gibson's character, but he wasn't the forward-thinking family man they show in the flick. He was a slave owner who didn't get married (to his cousin) until after the war was over. Historians also say that he actively persecuted and murdered native Cherokees. Plus, the thrilling Battle of Guilford Court House where he vanquishes his British nemesis? In reality, the Americans lost that one.
2001: A Space Odyssey
According to this film, in year 2001 we would have had manned voyages to Jupiter, a battle of wits with a sentient computer, and a quantum leap in human evolution. Instead we got the Mir Space Station falling from the sky, Windows XP, and Freddy Got Fingered. Apparently the lesson here is that sometimes it's better when the movies get the facts all wrong.
38
 
Interesting Story?
Yes No

Comments


  • erikggrep
    posted by erikggrep
    I suppose film makers sometimes include an anachronism or two in a history film that doesn't necessarily need to be perfect. They just want to entertain audiences, that's all.

    In "300", not only the Persian king Xerxes portrayed in the film wasn't a Cirque Du Soleil performer, he didn't wear a ZZ Top-like beard like he actually did in history.
    posted 109 days ago
  • MetalMario2
    posted by MetalMario2
    Well, "A Knight's Tale" wasn't meant to be taken seriously. It was just kind of a rock n' roll fable.
    posted 119 days ago
  • theohiostateguy
    Yeah, they should probably replace (or move up to #1) 2001 with that stupid Knight's Tale. I'm really surprised that they laid off on that one.

    As for Braveheart, Wallace was just as much a dirty murdering bastard as the freakin' British, if not more so.

    Another minor nitpicky thing from The Patriot. The lead soldiers that the kids are playing with and later melted into bullets, weren't toys. Lead toy soldiers like those didn't come around until many, many years later. Those were reserved for troop movements by military leaders.

    I guess, since Marion was a former military man, those could have been his and given to the kids, but I really kind of doubt it.

    Nice fun story. I love it when someone is more critical than I am about some of these silly historical inaccuracies.
    posted 119 days ago
  • MetalMario2
    posted by MetalMario2
    At the beginning of "Braveheart", as Robert the Bruce prepares to relate the tale of William Wallace to the viewer, he cautions that British historians will call him a liar.

    Well, I guess that's because he is a big fucking liar.
    posted 120 days ago
  • hardcourters
    posted by hardcourters
    I am all for as much historical accuracy as the next person. However, some of these points seem really trite. Some good points but overall the author went overboard here to make her point.
    posted 120 days ago
  • TheObscure
    posted by TheObscure
    Whoever took 2001 Space Odyessey seriously, in regards to what the future held, was just as fucked up in the head as the stoners watching the flick after dropping some primo LSD. The movie was made for a visually stunning, mind-altering look into a fantasy future. It wasn't a time-capsule into neverland. Therefore it is neither historical, nor inacurate. Kubrick is a genuis with a keen sense of photography...not Nostradamus. You lose. Kubrick wins.
    posted 120 days ago